Colin James's column for the Otago Daily Times for 3 February 2009
Click title for full story.
Tuesday 10 February 2009
'Considering' the constitution with the Maori party
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
JOIN US ON FACEBOOK
Popular Posts
-
By Steve Baron. Unemployed teenagers walk down the streets of every town in the Waikato, spray cans hidden under their hoodies, usually lo... -
By Steve Baron It was Winston Churchill who said, “Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Like the names of loves... -
ACT New Zealand MP and former Finance Minister Sir Roger Douglas today addressed British business leaders, economists, policy makers and pol...
Guidebook to Direct Democracy
Click picture to download the Guidebook to Direct Democracy
2 comments:
Colin James hits the "constitutional" nail on the head when he observes:
"Entrenching a provision of the Electoral Act is by a simple parliamentary majority. Another simple parliamentary majority can remove the entrenchment."
Precisely. And why is that? Because we do *not* have a constitution. When we finally get round to granting ourselves our first real, democratic constitution, one of its most basic provisions will be that *no* assembly of whatever kind will *ever* be able to overturn it or any of its clauses without formal permission from the people in binding referendums.
Dominic makes a very important and valid point here. We think we live in a democracy but we are far from it. Heaven forbid the day we elect a party with a leader that turns out to be demented. It will be too late then. The time to get our cupboard in order is yesterday.
Post a Comment